<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for What's my beef with Blackboard?</title>
	<link>http://www.im10yearsbehind.com/smcblog</link>
	<description>&#62;blog for Prof. Krista Hoefle's courses&#60;</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 16:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Chapter 2- Time by GinaS</title>
		<link>http://www.im10yearsbehind.com/smcblog/?p=87#comment-802</link>
		<dc:creator>GinaS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 01:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.im10yearsbehind.com/smcblog/?p=87#comment-802</guid>
		<description>Time is an incredibly broad topic that can be expressed in a variety of ways, thus offers artists a wealth of options for portraying it.  Because it is such a broad theme, pieces that portray time are particularly interesting, engaging, and thought provoking.

There are two main ways in which time can be portrayed in art.  The first is representation.  According to the text, "representation is the symbolic process by which an artwork refers to a subject beyond itself" (Robertson 36).  Representation is more about catching/portraying one snapshot in time.  The subject can be about any theme in combination with the theme of time.  
&lt;a href="http://s37.photobucket.com/albums/e63/captainvelocity/?action=view&#038;current=24.jpg" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;img src="http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e63/captainvelocity/24.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
Robertson states in the text that this piece, called Demo, by Heide Fasnacht,  "represents the explosion of a building as a suspended moment in time" (Robertson 34).  Photography was a key development in representing time, as it allowed for artists to show an extracted moment from real time (Stopping Time: Bullet through Apple).
&lt;a href="http://s37.photobucket.com/albums/e63/captainvelocity/?action=view&#038;current=stopping-time1.jpg" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;img src="http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e63/captainvelocity/stopping-time1.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  

The second way in which time can be portrayed is through embodiment.  Robertson defines embodiment as the integration of time itself in to the actual piece.  There is more than one way in which time can be integrated into the piece.  While less common, static pieces can portray time by showing time as a theme (Persistence of Memory, Salvador Dali), or the incorporation of old objects that evoke a feeling of antiquity, as shown in various Whitfield Lovell's pieces (this particular piece incorporating old bullet shells along with a charcoal drawing).  
&lt;a href="http://s37.photobucket.com/albums/e63/captainvelocity/?action=view&#038;current=31DaliPersistenceOfMemory.jpg" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;img src="http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e63/captainvelocity/31DaliPersistenceOfMemory.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://s37.photobucket.com/albums/e63/captainvelocity/?action=view&#038;current=artwork_images_291_214030_whitfield.jpg" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;img src="http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e63/captainvelocity/artwork_images_291_214030_whitfield.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
Another way to embody time into art is through the use video pieces that demonstrate fluid or kinetic change over time.  

Because time can be illustrated in such a variety of ways, I believe that it is not only one of the most interesting themes, but also one of the most important themes to address.  Time is inevitable, leaving artists with a wealth of ways in which to express their feeling of it: through embodiment or representation, with the use of kinetic or static pieces.  It encompasses many all forms of art, from 3d pieces to videos to painting.  The theme is all-inclusive, making it an almost necessary topic for every artist to address.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time is an incredibly broad topic that can be expressed in a variety of ways, thus offers artists a wealth of options for portraying it.  Because it is such a broad theme, pieces that portray time are particularly interesting, engaging, and thought provoking.</p>
<p>There are two main ways in which time can be portrayed in art.  The first is representation.  According to the text, &#8220;representation is the symbolic process by which an artwork refers to a subject beyond itself&#8221; (Robertson 36).  Representation is more about catching/portraying one snapshot in time.  The subject can be about any theme in combination with the theme of time.<br />
<a href="http://s37.photobucket.com/albums/e63/captainvelocity/?action=view&#038;current=24.jpg" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e63/captainvelocity/24.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"/></a><br />
Robertson states in the text that this piece, called Demo, by Heide Fasnacht,  &#8220;represents the explosion of a building as a suspended moment in time&#8221; (Robertson 34).  Photography was a key development in representing time, as it allowed for artists to show an extracted moment from real time (Stopping Time: Bullet through Apple).<br />
<a href="http://s37.photobucket.com/albums/e63/captainvelocity/?action=view&#038;current=stopping-time1.jpg" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e63/captainvelocity/stopping-time1.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"/></a>  </p>
<p>The second way in which time can be portrayed is through embodiment.  Robertson defines embodiment as the integration of time itself in to the actual piece.  There is more than one way in which time can be integrated into the piece.  While less common, static pieces can portray time by showing time as a theme (Persistence of Memory, Salvador Dali), or the incorporation of old objects that evoke a feeling of antiquity, as shown in various Whitfield Lovell&#8217;s pieces (this particular piece incorporating old bullet shells along with a charcoal drawing).<br />
<a href="http://s37.photobucket.com/albums/e63/captainvelocity/?action=view&#038;current=31DaliPersistenceOfMemory.jpg" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e63/captainvelocity/31DaliPersistenceOfMemory.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"/></a><br />
<a href="http://s37.photobucket.com/albums/e63/captainvelocity/?action=view&#038;current=artwork_images_291_214030_whitfield.jpg" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><img src="http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e63/captainvelocity/artwork_images_291_214030_whitfield.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"/></a><br />
Another way to embody time into art is through the use video pieces that demonstrate fluid or kinetic change over time.  </p>
<p>Because time can be illustrated in such a variety of ways, I believe that it is not only one of the most interesting themes, but also one of the most important themes to address.  Time is inevitable, leaving artists with a wealth of ways in which to express their feeling of it: through embodiment or representation, with the use of kinetic or static pieces.  It encompasses many all forms of art, from 3d pieces to videos to painting.  The theme is all-inclusive, making it an almost necessary topic for every artist to address.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chapter 3 - Place by Chapter 3 - Place - What’s my beef with Blackboard? - Free &#8230; - ezineaerticles</title>
		<link>http://www.im10yearsbehind.com/smcblog/?p=110#comment-800</link>
		<dc:creator>Chapter 3 - Place - What’s my beef with Blackboard? - Free &#8230; - ezineaerticles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 07:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.im10yearsbehind.com/smcblog/?p=110#comment-800</guid>
		<description>[...] Katie Fisher             var varsarray=[]; varsarray[0]='10649'; if(!token) {var token='0'} else {var [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Katie Fisher             var varsarray=[]; varsarray[0]=&#8217;10649&#8242;; if(!token) {var token=&#8217;0&#8242;} else {var [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Camille Utterback. by KatieF</title>
		<link>http://www.im10yearsbehind.com/smcblog/?p=72#comment-799</link>
		<dc:creator>KatieF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.im10yearsbehind.com/smcblog/?p=72#comment-799</guid>
		<description>Ooooooo! I like the piece of the text done in primary colors a LOT. For some reason primary colors INSTANTLY grab my attention, and are my favorite combination of colors. Utterback is also quite a bitchin' last name to have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooooooo! I like the piece of the text done in primary colors a LOT. For some reason primary colors INSTANTLY grab my attention, and are my favorite combination of colors. Utterback is also quite a bitchin&#8217; last name to have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Camille Utterback. by GraceK</title>
		<link>http://www.im10yearsbehind.com/smcblog/?p=72#comment-798</link>
		<dc:creator>GraceK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 01:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.im10yearsbehind.com/smcblog/?p=72#comment-798</guid>
		<description>Sweet Jen!  What was her most  famous piece?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet Jen!  What was her most  famous piece?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fisher Talking about Fisher! :) by krista</title>
		<link>http://www.im10yearsbehind.com/smcblog/?p=73#comment-797</link>
		<dc:creator>krista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.im10yearsbehind.com/smcblog/?p=73#comment-797</guid>
		<description>http://www.bucknell.edu/images/Depts/Communication/VernonFisher.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bucknell.edu/images/Depts/Communication/VernonFisher.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.bucknell.edu/images/Depts/Communication/VernonFisher.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Did Nostradamus Have a Sister? by kmspohrer</title>
		<link>http://www.im10yearsbehind.com/smcblog/?p=20#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>kmspohrer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 01:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.im10yearsbehind.com/smcblog/?p=20#comment-276</guid>
		<description>To be honest, I didn't think of 9/11 when I saw this piece either.  Had you not brought it up, I probably never would have.  But maybe it doesn't symbolize the 9/11 attack specifically.  It could be a depiction of terrorism in general.  Or it could be a depiction of how humanity has the power to destroy itself, either with one swift attack like a bomb or with time destroying the world like global warming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, I didn&#8217;t think of 9/11 when I saw this piece either.  Had you not brought it up, I probably never would have.  But maybe it doesn&#8217;t symbolize the 9/11 attack specifically.  It could be a depiction of terrorism in general.  Or it could be a depiction of how humanity has the power to destroy itself, either with one swift attack like a bomb or with time destroying the world like global warming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on chapter five the body, Collier Schorr by CaitlinD</title>
		<link>http://www.im10yearsbehind.com/smcblog/?p=36#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator>CaitlinD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 20:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.im10yearsbehind.com/smcblog/?p=36#comment-273</guid>
		<description>I think those pictures really were interesting. Personally, I think gender is how you view yourself. If you think of yourself as a women and act/dress as a woman, then you are one, despite whatever parts you were born with. I thought Collier Schorr's art was intriguing because it made you question whether the figure was female, male or both. It seemed to me to represent how their is no one who fits into one gender category. Everyone has male and female characteristics or interests. No one falls perfectly into the "ideal woman" or "ideal man" category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think those pictures really were interesting. Personally, I think gender is how you view yourself. If you think of yourself as a women and act/dress as a woman, then you are one, despite whatever parts you were born with. I thought Collier Schorr&#8217;s art was intriguing because it made you question whether the figure was female, male or both. It seemed to me to represent how their is no one who fits into one gender category. Everyone has male and female characteristics or interests. No one falls perfectly into the &#8220;ideal woman&#8221; or &#8220;ideal man&#8221; category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spirituality by CaitlinD</title>
		<link>http://www.im10yearsbehind.com/smcblog/?p=48#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator>CaitlinD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 20:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.im10yearsbehind.com/smcblog/?p=48#comment-272</guid>
		<description>I think that having the same sense of spirituality would help to understand the message the artist is trying to send, especially in a piece like this one, but it isn't necessary. I think a big part of art is personal interpretation based on life experiences and beliefs. I'm more interesting in why this piece disturbing. All that really separates us from animals is the ability to reason and opposable thumbs. Why is this piece disturbing? Is it because we don't like to be reminded that we were once animals, or just the personal nature of birth that freaks us out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that having the same sense of spirituality would help to understand the message the artist is trying to send, especially in a piece like this one, but it isn&#8217;t necessary. I think a big part of art is personal interpretation based on life experiences and beliefs. I&#8217;m more interesting in why this piece disturbing. All that really separates us from animals is the ability to reason and opposable thumbs. Why is this piece disturbing? Is it because we don&#8217;t like to be reminded that we were once animals, or just the personal nature of birth that freaks us out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spirituality by Elizabeth McDonald</title>
		<link>http://www.im10yearsbehind.com/smcblog/?p=48#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth McDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 21:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.im10yearsbehind.com/smcblog/?p=48#comment-265</guid>
		<description>I think that by making people question the artwork and its meaning just makes the artist successful because whether or not people like or understand the piece, they can't stop thinking about it. So pretty much either way the piece is successful. Also spirituality is a pretty personal thing so it wouldn't be surprising if someone did have to have the same beliefs and what not</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that by making people question the artwork and its meaning just makes the artist successful because whether or not people like or understand the piece, they can&#8217;t stop thinking about it. So pretty much either way the piece is successful. Also spirituality is a pretty personal thing so it wouldn&#8217;t be surprising if someone did have to have the same beliefs and what not</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chapter 5:The Body by Elizabeth McDonald</title>
		<link>http://www.im10yearsbehind.com/smcblog/?p=35#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth McDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 21:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.im10yearsbehind.com/smcblog/?p=35#comment-264</guid>
		<description>I agree when the actual body is missing it makes the viewer think about the piece more and about what the artist is really implying. An object can be bold and symbolic without even having people in the art work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree when the actual body is missing it makes the viewer think about the piece more and about what the artist is really implying. An object can be bold and symbolic without even having people in the art work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
